tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11923437.post1463461364412068869..comments2007-02-28T18:04:43.980-05:00dakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02768386460112735397noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11923437.post-7206425595542400102007-02-28T18:04:00.000-05:002007-02-28T18:04:00.000-05:00Interesting response <A HREF="http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?no=347813&rel_no=1" REL="nofollow">here</A> as well. <BR/><BR/>Excellent question: why do the Editors of the NYT allow this nonsense?dakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02768386460112735397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11923437.post-65103120306025271702007-02-28T11:36:00.000-05:002007-02-28T11:36:00.000-05:00<B>But their attempt to introduce these new-age statistics into the game threatens to undermine most fans’ enjoyment of baseball and the human factor therein.</B><BR/><BR/>...How? What? How? <BR/><BR/><I>Most</I> fans' enjoyment is threatened by statistics? Most?<BR/><BR/>Can't people who don't like statistics just ignore statistics? It only helps us -- more dummies to write about.<BR/><BR/>But seriously: MOST of them are being threatened? By VORP?Ken Tremendoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15290167169845520176noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11923437.post-14317658709371622672007-02-27T23:05:00.000-05:002007-02-27T23:05:00.000-05:00For those interested, BP has responded as well <A HREF="http://www.baseballprospectus.com/unfiltered/?p=233&PHPSESSID=8f0f664d9c738a77ffb72f461208e3c0" REL="nofollow">here</A>.dakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02768386460112735397noreply@blogger.com