tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11923437.post6436548834353052580..comments2007-05-22T11:58:04.937-04:00dakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02768386460112735397noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11923437.post-55745967347420272342007-05-22T11:58:00.000-04:002007-05-22T11:58:00.000-04:00Paul writes:<BR/><BR/><B>While the point that Rolen is hardly an answer to offensive woes, your implication that Dodger Stadium is cavernous was off-base. Dodger Stadium actually increases home runs for hitters, rating just below Coors Field in that category. While it's overall Index is below average for runs (at 95), it is a HR park.</B><BR/><BR/>Mea culpa. I looked at the wrong stat row on ESPN's Park Factor's page. And you'll see why, if you follow <A HREF="http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/stats/parkfactor" REL="nofollow">this link</A> soon, before it all changes, and you notice that Coors Field is .877 for HR. What the hell?!?!Ken Tremendoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15290167169845520176noreply@blogger.com