tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11923437.post7717870204263559375..comments2008-05-28T16:10:31.516-04:00dakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02768386460112735397noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11923437.post-15400097123106653032008-05-28T16:10:00.000-04:002008-05-28T16:10:00.000-04:00Alright, I'll be the guy who defends Joe Morgan. Nobody's happy about this, but, here goes.<BR/><BR/>Re: Bonds/'roids. Morgan never said that he didn't understand <I>why</I> Bonds became the poster boy. He just said that it's unfortunate. <BR/><BR/>And I agree with him. As we've discussed many times -- and feel free to bring up <I>Frat House</I> again if you like -- I think it's unfortunate that steroid users get vilified more than the other cheaters in baseball history. And similarly, I agree with Morgan that it's unfortunate that Bonds gets vilified more than other steroid users. In both cases, I understand why...I (We? Ugh. We.) just think it's not cool. <BR/><BR/>Qui vole un oeuf vole un boeuf, bitches.dakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02768386460112735397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11923437.post-43423335791755959082008-05-28T13:47:00.000-04:002008-05-28T13:47:00.000-04:00<B>Joe has been baited one thousand times by people using "consistency" in the question, and he's never once indicated that this is strange or unusual.</B><BR/><BR/>Not only that, but out of the presumably hundreds of millions of questions he's getting, he's specifically picking all of the ones with "consistency" in them. Maybe he thinks it's like his "mega-dittoes" or something.Juniorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12399868922850358920noreply@blogger.com