Monday, December 03, 2007

Comments Commence

Ah, reader comments.

You guys have been asking us to enable them for years now. It's been on ongoing debate among team FJM for a while now -- it was like our NAFTA or something. (I have no idea what NAFTA actually is, or what happened to it.) One of us was pretty hardcore in favor of 'em, and the other two didn't really care that much. Then suddenly we had a breakthrough: if two of us don't really care about it, why not just try it out and see what happens? As you can imagine, it was a pretty exciting moment for all of us.

So, that's what we're doing. We're opening up comments to all readers.

BUT, be good, people. Obviously we reserve the right to delete any comments for little or no reason. And if we see enough dogshit, we'll shut the whole thing down.

So, what is good shit and what is dogshit? Just be cool. Move the discussion forward. Bring up a different point of view. No 4chan memes.

DOGSHIT:
1) "You guys suck. You are all arrogant pricks who are guilty of the same pig-headedness that you rail against."
We know. Everyone knows.

2) "You guys are f*#$%!##@ing hilarious and your arguments are right on the money!"
Several problems: (a) This is boring. (b) There's no reason to censor yourself; this is the fucking internet and we like to swear. (c) If you're going to censor yourself because you're a God-fearing weirdo or whatever, don't use like nine symbols. And why are three of them "#"?

3) "Paging Dr. Saltalamacchia!"
I don't get it. And even if I did, I don't think I'd like it.

GOOD SHIT:
1) "I have done some research that I think might add to the discussion. Let me share it with you..."

2) "I have a different way of interpreting the data at hand. Let me share it with you..."

3) "Why are you guys still using WARP to evaluate players? Can't we all agree that..."

4) "I have a really, really stupid pun involving Manny Acta and his disinclination to bunt. Let me share it with you..."

5) "I think you guys missed a food metaphor label opportunity."

Be smart and kind. Have fun. Enjoy.

If you're not used to looking at the comments, we use an antiquated "drill-down" method where every time you refresh the page, it tells you how many new comments there are. Sometimes. If it's working. So get ready to apple-R a lot. To read the comments, just click on the link that says "4 new comments" or whatever at the end of each post. To "collapse" the comments, just click on the link again.

77 comments:

  1. I think we need a food metaphor label!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let me be the first to say that "dogshit/good shit" should be a label.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The first reader comment on FJM really should have some substance to it. *Shrug*

    ReplyDelete
  4. Shouldn't the very mention of food metaphors open this post up to the label, or at the very least, the "liberal use" label?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Off to a strong start here, with this experiment.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Paging Dr. Saltalamacchia!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sooo, um, I haven't seen Joe Morgan on ESPN on Sunday nights, has he already been fired?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Aw man, I have been waiting for this on this site since I first learned about it. But given the first six or seven comments, I am pretty sure this will last for all of 10 minutes.

    In other news, I was dinking around on baseballreference.com, and... did you know Miggy Cabrera has an effing .930 career OPS at 24 yrs old??? I wish the Twins were one of those teams that "spent money" or "liked good players."

    ReplyDelete
  9. It appears likely that at least 1 out of 9 FJM readers doesn't understand exactly what a metaphor is.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Wahoooo, just what i have been waiting for.

    ReplyDelete
  11. lkl stole my thunder, so besides a timid "I love you people", I got nothin. /dogshit

    ReplyDelete
  12. How are you able to crunch all that data you use regularly, if you're on a mac?

    ReplyDelete
  13. I like where this is going. BTW, did anybody else here know that Barry Larkin has a 116 career OPS+? Sorry, just trying to be statistical.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I don't like that you are allowing comments. I don't like it one bit. You are taking FJM from its other-worldly elitist pedestal and placing it amongst the pedestrian rubble. Very bad move. Serious.

    ReplyDelete
  15. As long as the hoi polloi doesn't actually like Colin Cowherd, then what's the problem? Oh, they do? Nuts.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Ten Kremendous!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Speaking of food metaphors - which you were, tangentially - anyone catch the Sports Illustrated article on the Heisman race between Tebow and McFadden? The writer compared the vote to "choosing between an ice cream sundae and a banana split. Either way you pick, you'll regret not having the other one..." or something like that. Bonus points for it not really making sense. Celizik would be proud.

    ReplyDelete
  18. 21 comments and not one mention of David Eckstein. Until now.

    ReplyDelete
  19. F*** the heck took you so long?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Count me in as one who's not crazy about the whole reader comments idea. Most people simply do not have anything interesting to say, but that doesn't keep them from submitting comment after comment on their favorite blogs, even if it's just to say, "I agree!" or -- even worse -- to complain about something that they have no control over.

    You see? I just wasted your time and mine.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Well there isn't a lot of room to have a comment that actually pertains to the post, so all I'm gonna say is, thanks, this could be fun.

    Kevin

    ReplyDelete
  22. Will there be manny more bunting references today?

    /shows self out

    ReplyDelete
  23. Was "God-fearing weirdos" a necessary term?
    Also, Bill James wrote an interesting article about the clutch debate in SI. I'm not completely convinced on its validity, but hey it's worth a looksie.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Haiku Time:
    Eckstein or Erstad
    Which one would I rather have
    I'm fucked either way

    ReplyDelete
  25. I propose that "Eckstein's law" henceforth is the FJM equivalent of Godwin's law.

    ReplyDelete
  26. In re: Bonds post below- Giants underperformed about 6 games last year, so given a tiny bit of luck, Jenkins will see them improve significantly next year- and his idiocy will become more ingrained...

    ReplyDelete
  27. Ken, get back to work.

    - Jon Fremulon
    CEO Fremulon Ins.
    Partridge, Kansas

    ReplyDelete
  28. I'm not sure Joe Morgan should be fired. He's the foundation of most of the happiest moments I spend during the workday. If anything, his brand of wacky non-sensicleness (that's a work right?) should be expanded to other sports.

    Just imagine a KT write-up of a Joe Morgan luge-related chat.

    JM: "Hard to say not having seen the Norwegian women much this year, but they are consistent and it's really anyone's event at this point, as long as the US starts Sheff . . . "

    KT: /Wince

    You get the idea. Someone get my conversation hat and get Norby on the phone. (Too many gets?)

    ReplyDelete
  29. I'm having a hard time concetrating as I read through these inconsistent comments.

    /Joe Morgan

    ReplyDelete
  30. First post!

    Or um ... not.

    Speaking of Eckstein, don't forget to check out his feature in Highlights.

    It was squeezed in between the Timbertoes and Hidden Pictures.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Just a thought ...

    Is there a way to have two comment sections? Maybe one Blogger (for FJM members) and one Haloscan (for us peons)? That way people can sift through you guys' comments alone in the website or sift through all the $#!+ we put up in a separate window.

    Something to consider.

    May I say, I love this site.

    ReplyDelete
  32. These comments make it very hard to concetrate on the post, because they are very inconsistent.
    I can't comment about the consistency of comments on other blogs, because I haven't read them, but Dave Concepcion always was good for an insightful comment.

    ReplyDelete
  33. fireopencommentingonfirejoemorgan.com

    ReplyDelete
  34. Why no thoughts on the Lastings Milledge trade?

    That trade was like swapping your chocolate milk at lunch for Tang!

    ReplyDelete
  35. Check out Hat Guy's FJM like hit piece on Don Imus on MSNBC.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Jeez, shut it down already. Forty comments and about six are worth reading.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Can you please please please write more about Jim Rome? Every time I watch his show I want to blow up his head. The things that he says are asinine and untrue, and he seems like the kind of guy this website would rail on. Yet, I have only found ONE article about him (which was hilarious, by the way).

    PLEASE rail on Rome. He's the Darin Erstad of sports journalism.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Not a fan of the comments

    I like to think of you guys as immortals in the blogging world, and this just brings you down towards the level of us peasants.

    Also, your comments will be much funnier than ours.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I can't believe you did this. This is taint city. Your blog was perfect before this. Just by my sheer commenting, I am poisoning your blog because I lack the sheer ability to critique sportswriters as you do. And see what I did there? I used the word sheer twice in a sentence. Would you ever do that? Eff-uck no you wouldn't, you'd have more sense.

    Don't allow the pagans entrance to the gates. They shall not pass.

    ReplyDelete
  40. So get ready to apple-R a lot.

    ----------

    People still use Macs?

    ReplyDelete
  41. Long time reader, first time caller. How about closing down the reader comments and increasing the frequency of posting?

    www.firemostcommentersonthisthread.com

    ReplyDelete
  42. Emmitt Smith Vs. Joe Morgan in a "Who Can Say the Least in the Least Coherrent Manner While actually Speaking for an Extended Period of Time"- constest. Who wins?

    ReplyDelete
  43. This won't end well, but at least it answers the question of why we can't have anything nice.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Well I'm sure this is exactly what the guys were hoping for.

    I'm amazed that we've yet to have a post dedicated to creme de la creme blowhard Hank Steinbrenner.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I have to say I thought I'd enjoy reading more comments. I'm less sure now that I've had a chance to read more comments. Maybe there's some way to put the comments elsewhere and have someone include the best ones on the site?

    ReplyDelete
  46. I think the best solution would be to have two comment sections, one for FJM writers, one for dogshit.

    And another thing, Firejoemorgan.com has really become firejoemorganhirekentremendous.com, 9/10 posts are KT, the other is Junior.

    ReplyDelete
  47. So far FJMs S/G (shit/good) rating is an astounding 48.

    ReplyDelete
  48. See the trend I started by using "concetrate" and "consistent" in the same sentence? I posted mine, then 2 others followed suit with virtually the same sentence. I must be funny!

    Read the comments before posting, morons.

    ReplyDelete
  49. I agree that this is a bad idea... While I understand that it absolutely makes your lives easier, well, that doesn't really concern me, now does it?

    Honestly, though, you're going to end up with the same problems you had when you shut down comments the first time. A lot of pointless drivel with no real discussion.

    Might I suggest a forum for you guys? You can set up forums for free, something like (http://www.vbulletin.com/).

    I think that'd work much, much better.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I have an idea.

    It's a little bit crazy, so just bear with me.

    If you don't like reading the comments, then ... don't.

    I know, it's totally out there, but I think just maybe it can work.

    Also, those who are judging the experiment by this one post ... come on. It's the first one, and the story itself that everyone is commenting on is itself about the commenting. This particular "discussion" can't be used to judge anything of interest.

    ReplyDelete
  51. I agree... but with who?

    ReplyDelete
  52. please stop public comments.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Please stop making fun of my son.

    ReplyDelete
  54. This is the most pretentious list of comments I've ever read. Take that, everybody who commented before me!

    ReplyDelete
  55. Thanks for letting me post, I will now trade you Carlos Silva as pittance.

    ReplyDelete
  56. @ pudge, That is the most balanced article on Eckstein I've read. Leave it the Highlights to cut to the quick/

    ReplyDelete
  57. I like the comment forum idea presented by Act...

    http://www.vbulletin.com/

    You can also use Ballhype, but I have no idea if that's free. Anything, please, just not this.

    ReplyDelete
  58. My bad, you win the internet, Stats Guy. Congrats, douchey.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Well, Dak, it was worth a shot.

    ReplyDelete
  60. [elated, drunk, enraged, passes out]

    ReplyDelete
  61. I like the comments. Baseball + Trenchant + Smartass = A ray of sunshine into my otherwise dreary life.

    If you don't like the comments, don't read 'em. Damn, that was hard.

    ReplyDelete
  62. I just heard the giant sucking sound of lost productivity...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_sucking_sound

    Hopefully this comment section works better than at FanHaus...

    ReplyDelete
  63. Most Disastrous Experiments of All Time, by Disaster Rate (DR):

    1. Tuskegee
    2. This

    ReplyDelete
  64. I agree with that guy somewhere up there. Can the comments and increase the frequency of your posts.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Define irony: making a comment to tell everyone how terrible the comments are.

    ReplyDelete
  66. ...a highly embarrassing day for the FJM team.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Look... RE: "OMG, if j00 dunt lyk them dunt read them!!!11eleven"

    I don't know about any other lunatic who follows this web site, but I enjoy reading the webmasters' comments, and think their descretion was good as far as what got posted and what didn't. I want to continue to see what KT, DAK, Junior, and co. have to say about the articles. But when this is swamped with inane posts, it makes it hard.

    Again: Forums.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Once the shock leaves I think the comments will calm down and be better. You guys need a new player to go after. Eckstein is getting boring. Maybe take a poll to see who will be the next "Eckstein".

    ReplyDelete
  69. @Act:

    Damn, it's a good thing I don't give a shit what you think!

    ReplyDelete
  70. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Everybody wants to touch their favorite piece of art, and if everybody did, it would be ruined.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Long-time read, first-time caller. This blog sucks.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Listen: I know very little about how forums / online stuff works. That said, I'm interested in the possibility of setting up forums. I just don't want to get involve in heavy lifting. I totally see how it could be a viable alternative to this mess.

    So if you know of an EASY way to set something up, beyond the name of a website that hosts forums -- or if you're willing to help set something up for us -- please tell me.

    E-mail me: dak@firejoemorgan.com.

    ReplyDelete
  74. ETA on the flame war: 15 minutes

    ETA on someone equating someone else's comment with Hitler: 17 minutes

    ReplyDelete
  75. Aaaand we're good.

    I'm gonna put a hold on this for now. Junior, Ken and I are getting together to watch the Patties game in a bit. We'll talk this whole mess over then.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.