[H]ere are five things the Chargers need to pull one of biggest upsets ever:
1. LaDainian Tomlinson must be a difference-maker.
The #1 offensive weapon the Chargers have must have a good game. That seems crazy to me, but keep going.
2. A surprising contribution from an unsung player.
He's talking about Billy Volek, if Rivers can't play. So, so far we have:
1. Chargers' running back must be good.
2. Chargers' QB must be good.
3. Keep those turnovers coming.
1. Chargers' running back must be good.
2. Chargers' QB must be good.
3. Chargers force turnovers.
4. Harrison and Seau play more like old Patriots rather than ex-Chargers.
1. Chargers' running back must be good.
2. Chargers' QB must be good.
3. Chargers force turnovers.
4. Some members of Patriots' defense do not play well.
5. History to repeat itself.
He's talking about Week 4 of the 2005 regular season, when the Bolts beat the Pats and broke their streak of home wins. So, to conclude, here are the things the Chargers need, in order to win the game:
1. Chargers' running back must be good.
2. Chargers' QB must be good.
3. Chargers force turnovers.
4. Patriots' defense does not play well.
5. Chargers [make? cause?] history [to] repeat[s] itself.
or
5. Chargers win game, thereby winning game.
Who needed this article to be written? This article is a waste of time. This article is the "liberal use of the 'food metaphors' label" label of "Keys to the Game"-style articles.
Labels: "'liberal use of "food metaphors" label' label" metaphors, "liberal use of 'food metaphors' label" label, chargers, don banks, football, liberal use of "food metaphors" label, patriots
