FIRE JOE MORGAN: Yankees-Indians, Not A-Rod

FIRE JOE MORGAN

Where Bad Sports Journalism Came To Die

FJM has gone dark for the foreseeable future. Sorry folks. We may post once in a while, but it's pretty much over. You can still e-mail dak, Ken Tremendous, Junior, Matthew Murbles, or Coach.

Main / Archives / Merch / Glossary / Goodbye

Tuesday, October 09, 2007

 

Yankees-Indians, Not A-Rod

I like this stat. I hope it's true.

Since TBS and ESPN keep telling us that it was Cleveland's clutch hitting that won the series:

New York, LDS - 60 LOB
Cleveland, LDS - 77 LOB


Thanks to reader Matthew. It's crazy how much of the series was determined by one man, Chien-Ming Wang, simply not performing up to expectations. He had two bad games. Horrendous games. Wang was charged with 12 earned runs over 5.2 innings. In a four-game span, that's just huge.

Wang was good to very good throughout the regular season, so he should be given a lot of credit for getting the Yankees to the playoffs in the first place, but it's tough to overcome your #1 guy giving up 18 baserunners in two games, especially when he only records three outs in one of those games.

** EDIT EDIT EDIT, EDIT ALL DAY LONG, AS I WRITE AN EDIT, I SING THIS EDIT SONG **

Reader Ed contributes this rebuttal to reader Matthew:

77 left on base in like 37 total innings? Come on, now.

The actual LOB totals were Cleveland 39, New York 24.


And more caustically, Jason sends this:

I don’t really think it’s a fair comparison. Cleveland had 65 hits + walks in the series and New York had 45.

It’s hard to leave guys on base when they don’t get there in the first place. After all, a team on the wrong side of a perfect game had 0 LOB. Great, huh?


I do think Cleveland had a large number of two-out hits; I don't think this was just over-the-top clutch-loving. The very fact that the Indians actually did get on base more than the Yankees, though, is certainly another part of the story.

Labels: ,


posted by Junior  # 5:35 PM
Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

Archives

04.05   05.05   06.05   07.05   08.05   09.05   10.05   11.05   12.05   01.06   02.06   03.06   04.06   05.06   06.06   07.06   08.06   09.06   10.06   11.06   12.06   01.07   02.07   03.07   04.07   05.07   06.07   07.07   08.07   09.07   10.07   11.07   12.07   01.08   02.08   03.08   04.08   05.08   06.08   07.08   08.08   09.08   10.08   11.08  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?